New Delhi2 minutes ago
- Copy link
The Supreme Court was hearing the petition of the West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board.
The Supreme Court on Friday asked the central government whether it wanted to build a wall like America on the Indian border. The court made this comment during the hearing on the petition of the West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board.
The court further said that the culture and language of the people of Bengal and Punjab is similar to neighboring countries. Their language is one but distributes them limits.
The West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board said in the petition that Bengali -speaking migrant laborers are being arrested illegally. The government is pressurizing them to go to Bangladesh.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who is presenting the government’s side, said that the claims of the West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board are unclear. Some state governments depend on illegal migrants.
The population is changing due to illegal migrants. You should also hear this case with the case of Rohingya.
Finally, the Supreme Court said that the matter is different. The High Court will be asked to take appropriate order after taking quick cognizance.
Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan was side by the West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board. The case was heard by Justice Suryakant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul M Pancholi.
In the court, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was presenting the side of the government. Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan was on behalf of the petitioners. The case was heard by Justice Suryakant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul M Pancholi.
Court Room Live …
Advocate Bhushan (petitioner): Notices have already been issued. The woman who was taken out had filed a petition in the High Court. But the government said it is pending, so do not do anything. The result was that the woman was thrown out without investigation, just because she is Bengali. There should be an agreement with the Bangladesh government. Otherwise it is a violation of international law.
Justice Kant: It has many facts. Only the pending case cannot be stopped. We will ask the High Court to decide the petition quickly. See also citizenship aspect.
Advocate Bhushan: How can any officer unconditionally expel someone as an alleged non-citizen?
Justice Kant: How to pass such an order that seems a little unclear? How will it be followed? Except for Assam, there is no tribunal of foreigners.
Advocate Bhushan: It will have very serious consequences. Sometimes BSF people say that run on the other side, otherwise they will shoot.
Justice Bagchi: There is a difference. If someone comes to the Indian territory, the process will have to be completed.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: Why have organizations come? Those who come will have to show proof of their presence legally.
Justice Bagchi: We need some explanation. The petition shows favoritism. Was foreigners considered to be seeing the language?
Justice Kant: If someone is speaking Bangla…
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: We want immigrants not to destroy our resources. Media report is not reliable. Some agents help in illegal entry.
Justice Kant: There is a large number of illegal people.
Advocate Bhushan: BSF cannot say that what we consider Bangladeshi will be excluded without investigation.
Justice Kant: Tell us the process. Some people are trying to enter, it is okay to send them back. But those who have evidence of citizenship have to be shown.
Justice Bagchi: National security, integrity, conservation of resources is necessary. The language of Bengal and Punjab is the same, the border divides. Explain the center.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: See also with the Rohingya case.
Justice Kant: Are they able to come here?
Advocate Bhushan: The woman was pushed across the border without asking the state government.
Justice Bagchi: This can be an exception, so the habeas corpus petition is pending.
Advocate Bhushan: Many people are in custody. The law only gives foreigners the right to take into custody, not the suspects. This is also happening in Gujarat. Thousands of people are in the custody center, panic is spreading.
Justice Bagchi: If the FIR is lodged then the police can take custody?
Justice Kant: Arrest can be detained. It is necessary to show citizenship evidence.
Advocate Bhushan: The defendants postponed the case to the High Court.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: The court was not postponed, the lawyer cannot say so. I always keep a distance between the court and Jantar Mantar.
Advocate Bhushan: Solicitor, your satire will not benefit you.
Justice Kant: This case is different. The High Court will be asked to take appropriate order after taking quick cognizance. There will be freedom to ensure citizenship of the family. Both sides were asked to file an answer.
,
Read this news too …
Justice Nagratna disagree with Supreme Court Collegium: Objection to Justice Vipul Pancholi’s appointment in SC
Supreme Court Judge BV Nagratna on Tuesday lodged a strong protest on the recommendation of the collegium to make Patna High Court Chief Justice Vipul Manubhai Pancholi a judge in the Supreme Court. He said, “This appointment can prove to be harmful for the judiciary.” If Justice Pancholi becomes a judge in the Supreme Court, he can become a CJI in October 2031. Read full news …
