Supreme Court Said Enforcement Directorate can’t act like Crook Low Conviction Rates | Supreme Court said-ED cannot work like thugs: Will have to remain under the purview of law, punishment in less than 10% cases in 5 years

  • Hindi news
  • National
  • Supreme Court Said Enforcement Directorate can’t act like Crook Low Conviction Rates

New Delhi4 minutes ago

  • Copy link

The Supreme Court on Thursday told the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a strict tone that it could not act like a thug. He will have to take action by staying within the limits of law. The court made this comment during a review petitions for the 2022 decision giving the power to arrest the ED under the Money Laundering Prevention Act (PMLA).

A bench of Justice Suryakant, Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh said that there is also concern about the image of ED. Justice Bhuiyan said that in the last five years, the ED registered about 5 thousand cases, but the rate of sentence is less than 10%.

He said, ‘You should work within the purview of law. When people get acquitted after 5-6 years in jail, who will compensate for it? On this, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for the Center and ED, said that influential accused deliberately delay the investigation.

The Supreme Court said- now the time has come to strictly take Justice Suryakant said that a separate courts should be formed for PMLA like TADA and POTA, where there is a daily hearing. This will resolve the cases soon. He said, ‘The influential accused will still file petitions, but they will know that the next date will be decided. Now the time has come to tighten such people.

The law should be seriously considered about cryptocurrency During the hearing, ASG Raju said that many accused leave the country and move to countries like Keman Island and influence the investigation through modern methods like cryptocurrency. On this, Justice Suryakant said that the government should seriously consider regulating cryptocurrency.

Supreme Court reprimanded ED 5 times in the last 1 year

21 July: Political battle is fine till elections, why use agencies for this Comment- Political battles should be fought in elections, not through investigating agencies. Why is ED being used like this? Do not open our mouth. Otherwise we will be forced to make harsh comments about ED. I have some experience of Maharashtra. Do not spread this violence across the country. Read full news … May 22: Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) petition in Tamil Nadu liquor shop license case

Comment- The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has crossed all limits. The ED does not need to intervene when the state government’s investigating agency is taking action in this matter. Read full news …

5 May: Arvind Singh’s bail plea hearing in Chhattisgarh liquor scam case Comment- The agency is just making allegations without any concrete evidence. We have seen many complaints of ED. It has become a pattern, just allegate, but do not refer to any evidence. Read full news …

12 February: On the petition of Arun Pati Tripathi accused in Chhattisgarh liquor scam case

Comment- The order to take cognizance of the ED complaint has been canceled from the High Court, so why should the accused stay in jail? The theory of PMLA cannot be that the person will remain in jail. Even after the cognizance is canceled, the person is in jail, what should it be called. We also saw that you did not even give us this information by yourself. Read full news …

August 4, 2024 On Sarla Gupta vs ED case

Comment: The agency is not giving the accused seized documents during the investigation. Is this not a violation of the fundamental right to life and personal freedom of the accused. There are very serious cases in which bail is granted, but nowadays people are not getting bail in magistrate cases. Read full news …

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *